I'm going to make up a word now, ok?

You ready? Here goes:

eukairopia

pronunciation: yoo-kahee-ro'-pee-ah

As you might guess, I formed it from Greek..

eukairia ("opportunity") + ops ("eye")

Like its cousin myopia, eukairopia is a vision condition, but it is not a condition of the eyes. It is a condition of the mind that affects the processing of information received through the eyes (and other senses as well, but we may say primarily the eyes).

To describe it most simply, eukairopia causes a person to see opportunity not seen by most people, by normal people, by the average person. It is a condition that can develop over time if someone forms the habit of looking for opportunity; but it can also develop spontaneously as an apparent predisposition of character. In its most extreme form, it causes the sufferer to see opportunity everywhere, in every situation.

And even people who do not suffer sustained eukairopia may experience moments of it, when specific circumstances create a startlingly obvious opportunity.

I consider myself eukairopic, and work at becoming more so, being fond of asking what I call the GQC, or the Great Question of Capitalism: "Where's the opportunity?"

This separates me from many of my neighbors, who seem to view most things primarily in terms of potential threats or dangers. I acknowledge the value of being aware of threats or dangers; but I fear that sometimes people with kakopia (yep, I just made that up, too - kakos ("evil") + ops ("eye")) invent threats that aren't there, or allow real threats to blind them to real opportunities.

Eukairopia is not to be confused with being a Pollyanna - it does not say, "Everything is going to be fine" all the time. It says, "Hm. What can we do in this situation to make things better somehow?" - or even asks, more directly and ham-handedly, "How can I make money here?"

The full-blown eukairopic, however, sees so much opportunity in the world that making money is only a small part of the spectrum. Opportunities to exercise power, to learn, to help others, to create...the list, in a world designed for abundance and inhabited by billions of brains, is endless.

WANTED: Brains for Haiti - UPDATE

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote a post, "WANTED: Brains for Haiti," which outlined a idea for an initiative that might lift Haiti out of poverty. The idea was inspired by the work of Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto, head of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy, on formalizing informal economies, and Mark S. Miller and Marc Stiegler, chief technology officer and chief operating officer, respectively, of Combex, Inc., a software firm focused on the development of secure distributed computing systems, who wrote a paper about using "smart contracts" to implement Mr. de Soto's ideas.

This post is to report that I have emailed those three men to inform them about that post.

That is all. 

WANTED: Brains for Haiti

I would like some people's help in thinking about something. About 10 years ago, in a feverish bout of writing, I sketched the outline of an initiative to lift Haiti out of poverty. I would like help in thinking about whether or not any of it makes sense, or is in any way doable.

The outline was based on fragmentary knowledge of two things:

1) The work of Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto, the founder of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy. I learned about de Soto through an article in Forbes magazine in May, 2000, titled "Waking Dead Capital." The article outlined de Soto's belief that the key to the development of poor nations is the establishment of universal property rights - that such rights make prosperity possible because they enable people to use land ownership to access capital. The economic growth of the U.S., for instance, was largely driven by the fact that a farmer could use his land as collateral for a loan to buy a tractor that increased his productivity and his profits.

Reading the article immediately placed de Soto in my personal pantheon; reading his book that came out around the same time, "The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else," strengthened his position there - especially because of what it said about Haiti: that the poor of Haiti held informal ownership of assets worth $5.4 billion, more than the total of all the aid that had ever come into the country. But the value of those assets was trapped in a legal system under which it took 19 years to gain legal title to property. If a more efficient system of property ownership were developed, Haiti might rise out of poverty.

2) de Soto's work had already transformed my thinking when I came across a paper, "The Digital Path: Smart Contracts and the Third World, by Mark S. Miller and Mark Stiegler, in which the authors propose implementing de Soto's ideas by using "smart contracts" - "contracts as program code, where the terms of the contract are enforced by the logic of the program's execution."

The introduction to the paper alone was enough to set my neurons on fire:

Because binding contracts for ownership transfer lie at the heart of capital formation, what if traditional contracts were supplemented and/or supplanted with smart contracts? Smart contracts will enable cooperation among mutually suspicious parties, often without need for legal recourse. Could such a jurisdiction-free contracting mechanism, accessible over the Net, dramatically increase capital liquidity, spawning a flood of new wealth in the poorest areas of the world? (emphasis added)

**************************

As the January 1, 2004 bicentennial of Haiti's independence approached, I received invitations for a celebratory cruise to the island. Cruises have never appealed to me - the glowing testimonies of everyone I have ever known who has gone on a cruise have never overcome my lack of interest in spending days at a time on a big boat. But I thought seriously about going on the Haiti Bicentennial cruise, for one reason: to convene a meeting to discuss the possibility and feasibility of implementing smart contracts in Haiti.

That meeting is what I wrote the outline about. I listed the parties that I would want to have present:

• Hernando de Soto and members of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy,
• leaders of the Haitian government,
• Miller and Stiegler, and computer programmers familiar with smart contracts, and
• American bankers

I listed the sub-meetings that I thought should happen, and the desired outcomes of each:

• ILD/programmers - an agreement to work together to produce the needed software - not just for smart contracts, but for the titling of land.
• ILD/Haitian government/programmers - an agreement for the Haitian government to use the software produced for titling land
• ILD/bankers/programmers - an agreement for the banks to use the software produced
• Haitian government/bankers - an agreement for the banks to lend in Haiti, based on newly-created land titles

And commitments for people to make publicly, to everyone:

• Programmers: We will develop smart contracts for implementation in Haiti and grant the Bankers an exclusive license if they pay us.
• ILD: We will provide the underlying social research for the development and implementation of smart contracts in Haiti if the Bankers will pay us.
• Bankers: We will pay the IT people if they will grant us an exclusive license on banking software for smart contracts in Haiti.
• Bankers: we will pay ILD if they will provide the underlying social research for smart contracts in Haiti.
• Programmers: We will provide the Haitian government with an exclusive license for the government software if the Haitian government will pay us.
• Haitian government: We will pay the programmers if they give us exclusive license to the government software.
• Haitian government: We will allow the Bankers to do business in Haiti, if they will lend to our people on favorable terms.
• Bankers: We will lend to the Haitian people on favorable terms if the Haitian government will allow us to use smart contracts there.

I drew a chart to show how implementing these agreements could produce money for everyone involved (the oval at the upper right says, "Combex people" - i.e., Miller, Stiegler et al):

I even imagined what I might say to the different parties to induce their participation:

• To Bankers: "You can create a lending market so big that you won't be able to make loans fast enough to service it, and you can have exclusive control of that market for five years or longer."
• To the Haitian government: "You can increase your tax revenues by $50 million a year or more. Your development of land law can leapfrog. Technology can enable better results more quickly than ILD's other projects have produced."
• Haitian citizens: "You can receive the financing you need to rise from poverty."
• Miller, Stiegler and programmers: "You can apply your theory and validate it in the real world."
• deSoto and ILD: "Your work can produce even more dramatic results in Haiti than it has in other places so far."

None of that ever happened, but it also did not disappear from my brain. When, for a time, I had substantial extra cash (gone now, alas), I considered creating a foundation to fund the development of property law in Haiti. Can't do that now, but maybe I can spark some thinking and some conversation and some connections that can refine this stuff and make it work.

Of course, the earthquake may relegate all such thinking and conversation to the realm of fantasy. Or not. By posting this, by making it public, I surrender all expectation about what will happen, and place it in the realm of pure possibility.

Could a software-based scheme of titling and transferring land, and of lending based on the validity of such titles and the value of the land, help to lift Haiti out of poverty? If so, what might it take to make that happen?

"My name is Elwin, and I'm an...

...entrepreneurial junkie."

I feel like saying that after the exercise I've just completed.

I went to the Pennsylvania Department of State's website, and I looked up all the businesses that I have created.

I had forgotten a few.

Since May 28, 1987, I have created four sole proprietorships, three limited partnerships, two for-profit corporations, two limited liability companies, and one non-profit corporation. That's a dozen entities, or nearly one every two years.

Why? Not just because I keep having business ideas so fantastic that they demand their own entities for execution. No, I think it's more a matter of loving the sense of possibility that comes with each fresh start. That, and the fact that fresh starts are so dang easy.

I love this about America: that anybody with a couple of hundred bucks can create a legal entity for doing business out of thin air, in 30 minutes.

Learning to run a company? An entirely different matter.

I remember reading that successful entrepreneurs start an average of x number of businesses that fail before they succeed. I don't remember what x was, but I think that on that score, I'm well-qualified.

Now to pursue the question, "What can I learn from my mistakes?"